Is No Employment Better Than Self-Employment? The Story of How Romania Managed To Create a Class of ‘Invisible’ and Forgotten Workers
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Romania has been, for the past decade, not only the country with the highest in-work poverty among the European member states, but - unlike most European member states - also a country with a steadily growing welfare polarization of the working force. The paper aims to explain why, after more than a decade of fine-tuning of labor market, fiscal and social policies, Romania still finds itself in this situation. Despite constant improvements over the past 12 years in the welfare indicators of the overall employed population, the gap between employees and self-employed widened. The paper documents the increasing differences in exposure to poverty and social exclusion between the two segments of the employed population and points out to the mix of factors responsible for this development. Unlike most of the European countries, where a certain gap between employees and non-employees is the result of the flexibilization of the labour market, thus of the increase in atypical and non-standard employment forms, in Romania this appears to be rather the result of a mix between a unique inherited structure of employment and an inadequate package of social and fiscal measures, which kept and further pushed self-employed into informality. Thus, contrary to other European countries, which face the problem of how to better protect workers in new forms of employment, Romania is still searching for a policy solution that would allow for both the existing self-employed to become ‘visible’ in a formal economy and the diversification of employment forms. Finally, the paper explores the possibilities to reverse the current trend.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Autoritatea Națională pentru Drepturile Persoanelor cu Dizabilități (ANDPD), Copii și Adopții, World Bank (2020). Diagnoza situației persoanelor cu dizabilități din România, co-financed ESF project of the operational program for administrative capacity 2014-2020. https://anpd.gov.ro/web/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Diagnoza-situatiei-persoanelor-cu-dizabilitati-in-Romania-2020-RO.pdf.
Behrendt, C., Nguyen, Q. A., & Rani, U. (2019). Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers, International Social Security Review, 72, 17-41. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12212.
Blake, A.A., Autin, K.L., & Wilkins-Yel, K.G. (2021). Precarious work in the 21st century: a psychological perspective, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Elsevier, Vol. 126, April 2021.
Blanchet, T., Chancel, L., & Gethin, A. (2019). How Unequal is Europe? Evidence from Distributional National Accounts, 1980-2017, WID.world Working Paper 2019/06. World Inequality Database. https://wid.world/document/bcg2019-full-paper/.
Burja, C., & Burja, V. (2014). Sustainable development of rural areas: A challenge for Romania, Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 13(8), 1861-1871. http://www.eemj.icpm.tuiasi.ro/pdfs/vol13/no8/Full/2_161_Burja_14.pdf.
De Becker, E., Schoukens, P., & Barrio, A. (2022). Platform economy and the risk of in-work poverty: A research agenda for social security lawyers, in V. De Stefano et al. (eds), A Research Agenda for the Gig Economy and Society, 93-111, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
European Council (2019). Council Recommendation on Access to social protection for workers and the self-employed, Official Journal of the European Union, 2019/C387/01. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019H1115(01)&from=EN.
Gazibar, M., & Giuglea, L. (2019). Inequalities in Romania. Despite recent improvements in Romania, poverty and income inequality remain high, and regional disparities are deepening, Make Europe Sustainable for All Project, World Vision Romania. https://www.sdgwatcheurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/13.3.a-report-RO.pdf.
Ghenta, M. (2017). Characteristic of in-work poverty - a comparison between Romania and the European Union, Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 6(3), Bucharest: Editura Fundației România de Mâine. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=googlescholar&id=GALE%7CA518588839&v=2.1&i=r&sid=AONE&asid=b1319785 CALITATEA VIEŢII, XXVIII, 4, 351-369.
Guga, Ș. (2016). Munca atipică în România de la izbucnirea crizei. O perspectivă de ansamblu, București: Next Publishing. http://www.asociatiaconect.ro/munca-atipica-in-romania4&file=985.
Guga, Ș. (2019). Situația salariaților din România. Studiu annual 2018-2019, report SYNDEX România. https://www.syndex.ro/sites/default/files/files/pdf/2019-06/Situația%20salariaților%20din%20România%20%282019%29_0.pdf.
Hipp, L., Bernhardt, J., & Allmendinger, J. (2015). Institutions and the prevalence of nonstandard employment, Socio-Economic Review, 13 (2), 351-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv002.
Ilie, S. (2017). Venituri și performanță în politica socială, Calitatea Vieții, XXVIII, 4, 351-369. https://revistacalitateavietii.ro/journal/article/view/374/304.
Ilie, S. (2021). Between Heritage And Modernity: Employment And Incomes In Rural Post-Communist Romania, RCV, 1/2021. https://doi.org/10.46841/RCV.2021.01.02.
Ilie, S., & Preoteasa, A.M. (2017). O perspectivă asupra ocupării atipice: România în comparație Europeană, Calitatea Vieții, XXVIII, 3, Bucharest: Romanian Academy, 243-266. https://www.revistacalitateavietii.ro/oldrcv/2017/CV-3-2017/02.pdf.
International Labour Organization (2021), Extending social security to workers in the informal economy. Lessons from the international experience. A policy resource package, ILO, Social Protection Platform. https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/Course.action?id=3.
Jerg, L., O’Reilly, J., & Schulze Buschoff, K. (2021). Adapting social protection to the needs of multiple jobholders in Denmark, the United Kingdom and Germany, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 27(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258921991039.
Mitrică, B., Damian, N., Mocanu, I., & Grigorescu, I. (2019). Exploring the links between out-migration and social development in Romania. A Development Region-based approach, Human Geography and Regional Development, Europe XXI, 37, 53-70. 10.7163/Eu21.2019.37.4.
National Institute of Statistics (INS) (2018). Activitatea Independentă, Bucharest: INS. https://insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/field/publicatii/activitatea_independenta.pdf.
National Institute for Statistics (INS) (2022). Labor force in Romania. Employment and unemployment, Bucharest: INS. https://insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/field/publicatii/labour_force_in_romania_2021_0.pdf.
Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception, Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097796.
Pop, L.M., & Urse, D. (2017). Access to social protection for people working on non-standard contracts and as self-employed - Romania, ESPN thematic report, Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=17709&langId=en
Pop, L.M. (2018). In-Work Poverty in Romania, ESPN thematic report, Brussels: EC, December 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=21095&langId=en.
Pop, L.M. (2021a). Country chapter Romania, in S. Spasova, D. Ghailani, S. Sabato, & B. Vanhercke, Social protection of non-standard workers and the self-employed during the pandemic. Country chapters: Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Brussels, ETUI, 91-106. https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/Social%20protection%20of%20non-standard%20workers%20and%20the%20self-employed%20during%20the%20pandemic-country%20chapters-2021.pdf.
Pop, L. M. (2021b). Access to social protection for young people in Romania, ESPN thematic report, Brussels: EC. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=25112&langId=en
Pop, L. M., Pescaru, D., & Fărcășanu, D. (2021). Social protection and inclusion policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis in Romania, ESPN thematic report, Brussels: EC. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24620&langId=en.
Pop, L. M. (2022). Romania launches a system of service vouchers to bring domestic workers into the formal economy, ESPN flash report no 45, Brussels: EC. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=25954&langId=en.
Pop, L. M. (2023). Making access to social protection for workers and the self-employed more transparent through information and simplification in Romania, ESPN Thematic Report, Brussels: EC. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=26113&langId=en.
Preoteasa, A.M. (2015). Munca precară, soluție pentru populația vulnerabilă din mediul rural. Rezultate dintr-o cercetare calitativă, Calitatea Vieții, XXVI, 1, 36-59. https://www.revistacalitateavietii.ro/2015/CV-1-2015/03.pdf.
Preoteasa, A.M., Sieber, R., Budovksi, M., & Suter, C. (2017). Household role in Coping with Precarious Work. Evidence from Quality Research In Urban Romania and Switzerland, Social Change, Winter 2016, 14(2), 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2016-0027.
Romanian Government (2021). Planul Național de Redresare și Reziliență. Romania, București: Ministerul Investițiilor și Proiectelor Europene. https://mfe.gov.ro/pnrr/.
Romanian Government (2022). National Strategy for Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction 2022-2027. https://mmuncii.ro/j33/images/Documente/MMSS/Anexa_HG_440_2022_MO_Partea_I_359Bis.pdf.
Schoukens, P., & Weber, E. (2022). Now is the future of social security, Social Europe, EC. https://www.socialeurope.eu/now-is-the-future-for-social-security.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2020). Rewriting the Rules of the European Economy. An Agenda for Growth and Shared Prosperity. New York: W.W.Northon & Company.
Tamayo, H.X.Y., & Tumino, A. (2020). Europe, Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(3), 535-55.
Voinea, L., & Albu, L. (eds.) (2011). Economia informală și impactul ei asupra pieței muncii, Proiect POSDRU, implementat de BNS.
Williams, C., & Horodnic, A.I. (2017). Tackling bogus self-employment: some lessons from Romania, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1142/S108494671750011X.
World Bank (2015). Studiu de fundamentare pentru Strategia națională privind incluziunea socială și reducerea sărăciei 2015-2020. București: World Bank. http://www.mmuncii.ro/j33/images/Documente/Familie/2016/SF_BancaMondiala_RO_web.pdf.
World Bank (2018). From Uneven Growth to Inclusive Development: Romania's Path to Shared Prosperity. Systematic Country Diagnostic. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29864.